Comments on: Bishops deeply disappointed at new law’s disregard for rights of unborn https://nzcatholic.org.nz/2020/03/19/bishops-deeply-disappointed-at-new-laws-disregard-for-rights-of-unborn/ The New Zealand National Catholic Newspaper Thu, 09 Apr 2020 00:52:07 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Gregory https://nzcatholic.org.nz/2020/03/19/bishops-deeply-disappointed-at-new-laws-disregard-for-rights-of-unborn/#comment-56490 Thu, 09 Apr 2020 00:52:07 +0000 https://nzcatholic.org.nz/?p=20921#comment-56490 I know this is old news now, but it is worth considering Church strategy on this issue. Abortion was originally legalized in NZ when I was less that 10 years old. Now I’m in my 40s and it is now completely free for all.
Over that time I recall maybe 2-3 homilies that directly addressed abortion and that is been generous. Also over that 30 or so years it has been my impression that “pro-life” was always a fringe position, somewhat like been overly interested in novenas or Fatima apparitions.

So, as a rank n file observer, I seriously question the true acumen and actual strategy that has been applied over the last 30-40 years. I did not see clerical photo-op outside hospitals (as we saw with Climate marches) and I have not seen theatrical actions such as blood throwing (as was done by a NZ priest to a US ambassador) or passionate interference (such as the cutting of the Waihopea domes by a priest). Neither did I hear consistent direction on the corrosive evil of abortion and our moral obligations.
Thus, you get what you planned for over the course of 30-40 years. A Bernadinian “seamless garment”, which is a crumpled mess.

]]>
By: Gregory https://nzcatholic.org.nz/2020/03/19/bishops-deeply-disappointed-at-new-laws-disregard-for-rights-of-unborn/#comment-56370 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 04:51:31 +0000 https://nzcatholic.org.nz/?p=20921#comment-56370 Please, please, please, as the Bishop of a Diocese, (you’re a prince!) on such fundamental issues that demand personal courage do stop hiding behind the corporate speak of “bishop’s conference” and delegated “spokespersons” from non-ecclesial think-tank committees. Front up!

I seriously wonder if the pallid language is because priests and bishops, like the progressive politicians who vote this horror in, usually come from non-medical, humanities type backgrounds that they seem to struggle to imagine the depraved grotesquery of abortion. Subsequently there’s a struggle to elicit the corresponding responses. Rather, it always seems a little academic, philosophical, wait and see, partial, careful, middling, diplomatic, plausibly deniable or affirmed, pusillanimous, – “argued consistently”, “robust”, “dismayed”. Dismayed? I get dismayed at a parking ticket. Perhaps we need a thesaurus too…?

]]>
By: Hamish MacDonald https://nzcatholic.org.nz/2020/03/19/bishops-deeply-disappointed-at-new-laws-disregard-for-rights-of-unborn/#comment-55768 Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:56:36 +0000 https://nzcatholic.org.nz/?p=20921#comment-55768 There is precious little Bishops can do with the model of the current church they support and attempt to preserve.
The trend towards this problem grows by day along with porn, drugs, and euthanasia. It has been going on since TV arrived.
The answer lies in improving the contradiction; in this case, it is growth in personal prayer, a deeper prayer,
both accentuated by and born of asceticism.
You can’t have it both ways.
You must have fasting. How many fast during Lent purely because it is Lent?
It used to be fasting EVERY day.
The emerging problem is the birthrate. In a few years, countries once Christian may not be-purely on the number of Catholic births.
ONLY when the church recognises such entities that promote mysticism, promote asceticism will there ever be a chance for Catholicism to solidify into a strong bulwark of defense.
What Bishops CAN do, is encourage lay people to rise up and be Christian leaders, instead of claiming to be custodians of faith who somehow can dictate terms of reference. That means they need to practice what they expect must come from their dioceses. It means they need to look again at the reason behind the request for fasting on Wednesdays and Fridays of every week. They need only to address a group that number among the 40,000,000 plus pilgrims to Medjugorje. They will then get someone to bounce off like Pope Benedict XVI did just before he addressed the US. But if they speak to the average parishioner who expects priesthood to make a move before they do, they will get into a bigger quicksand than ever.
Furthermore, once laws have been passed by the social left (which the current PM of NZ represents), it is very hard to have them repealed.
First things first.
1. cut back on TV.
2. Fast EACH week
3. Pray EVERY day. One rosary the minimum.

]]>